Next Page

64th Note CPU Usage by DeadAwake at 2:31 AM EDT on June 11, 2005
Hi. Check it out. It's interesting, I think.
by AI-M at 10:08 AM EDT on June 11, 2005
Did you have all those programs running at the same time?
by Mouser X at 11:44 AM EDT on June 11, 2005
From what the picture shows, it looks like the songs take about 50% of your CPU for them to run (mostly). I had a 333 mhz CPU, and I could run F-Zero X without a problem, as well as Super Mario 64 (I actually have a list somewhere, but since I'm not home, I can't remember most of them). About 50% of the sets available ran without a problem, and the other 50% had a problem in at least 1 song in the set. However, most of them took nearly 90% or more of the CPU for them to run. SMB64 took like, 30-50% of the CPU, with the RSP turned on. With it turned off, it didn't run, most of the time.

The reason I bring this up is because I now have a 2ghz 64bit CPU, and most of the sets take 50% at most (usually far less, like 30%, at most). I'm just curious as to why, when you have a 2.2ghz CPU, it takes more CPU for you than it does for me, who has a slower CPU? Just curious, that's all. If it makes a differance, it's an AMD CPU...

Anyway, I guess that's it. Mouser X over and out.
by hcs at 11:58 AM EDT on June 11, 2005
It does seem like it takes up more CPU time than would seem proportional as you go to faster CPUs...
No clue where this effect comes from.
by DeadAwake at 8:55 PM EDT on June 11, 2005
> I'm just curious as to why, when you have a 2.2ghz CPU, it takes more CPU for you than it does for me, who has a slower CPU?

No idea. The only background apps were Notepad and TeaTimer. Plus, I've disabled a lot of Windows stuff that can slow the system down (services and the like).

Though... it had been about a week since I'd shutdown WinXP, and the number of handles was a little up--but nothing too bad. So maybe it was just the particular songs from either case. Or maybe it's your 64-bit processor.

> Did you have all those programs running at the same time?

Heheh. No, of course not.
by PdZ at 12:41 AM EDT on June 13, 2005
Ok.. my System:

Pentium 4 3,2 Ghz
Radeon x600 XT PCI Express 16x
2x Dual Channel 256 MB DDR2
S-ATA Drive 7200 Upm
OS: Windows XP Prof. SP2
Resolution:(usually 1600 x 1200, but for the screenshot I used 1024 x 768)
Running Processes: very much, at least 50 or more
CPU usage: only up to 13- 14% not more...
You see the 2 Graphs, its because of a Hyper-Threading CPU and u see sometimes dissipations of the graph.This is because when iam changing something, but this are not dissipations because of N64th Note.

It seems, your Computer must have some other problems.Maybe problems with Spyware,Malware or Something?And u see, on my Pc there are running very much processes...at the same time!

Viruses? ;)

PdZ


[IMG]http://www.imagehosting.us/himages/ihnp-532550thumb.jpg[/IMG]
by unknownfile at 11:07 AM EDT on June 13, 2005
My computer Techspecs :P

OS Name    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Version    5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600
OS Manufacturer    Microsoft Corporation
System Name    PSCONWAY
System Manufacturer    MEDIONPC
System Model    MS-7046
System Type    X86-based PC
Processor    x86 Family 15 Model 3 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2992 Mhz
Processor    x86 Family 15 Model 3 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2992 Mhz
BIOS Version/Date    Phoenix Technologies, LTD 6.00 PG, 31/08/2004
SMBIOS Version    2.3
Windows Directory    C:\WINDOWS
System Directory    C:\WINDOWS\system32
Boot Device    \Device\HarddiskVolume1
Locale    United States
Hardware Abstraction Layer    Version = "5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)"
User Name    PSCONWAY\Peter S. Conway
Time Zone    Eastern Daylight Time
Total Physical Memory    512.00 MB
Available Physical Memory    220.42 MB
Total Virtual Memory    2.00 GB
Available Virtual Memory    1.96 GB
Page File Space    1.22 GB
Page File    C:\pagefile.sys
Internet Connection Sympatico Highspeed (160kbit)
Hard Drive Capacity 160 GB
Space free part1-62.5 GB part2-3.03
by PdZ at 1:10 PM EDT on June 13, 2005
Very nice.... but that is not important for the diskussion y.y.

Whats with your CPU Usage when u run the 64th Note?

by unknownfile at 2:25 PM EDT on June 13, 2005
Barely anything, like 15% or something.
by DeadAwake at 11:02 PM EDT on June 13, 2005
Aww, you guys are trying to make me feel bad...

But look at the graph once more. As you can see, it varies greatly from song to song. This is how the portable sound format works. Apparently, the programmers for F-Zero X optimized their audio engine very well (either that, or HCS ripped it better than others); it uses 12-15% CPU.

Mario 64 songs can vary from 20-60%. Smash Bros. songs are lower, staying around 15%. "Phony" from Tetrisphere is a hog, staying around 45-60%.

Of course, this is all speculation on my part. Perhaps HCS can comment.

(Oh, and trust me: It's not spyware. And my computer may not be top-of-the-line, but it's nice.)

UNKNOWN FILE IS PETER S CONWAY OMG!

Next Page
Go to Page 0 1

Search this thread

Show all threads

Reply to this thread:

User Name Tags:

bold: [b]bold[/b]
italics: [i]italics[/i]
emphasis: [em]emphasis[/em]
underline: [u]underline[/u]
small: [small]small[/small]
Link: [url=http://www.google.com]Link[/url]

[img=https://www.hcs64.com/images/mm1.png]
Password
Subject
Message

HCS Forum Index
Halley's Comet Software
forum source